dmayo2

That's really odd, cause I'm pretty certain that in the past I wouldn't have to have the open parenthesis 1.45-.78)*300 would show the answer of 201 (as now my workflow is: ) 1.45-.78)* backspace alt-left-arrow ( alt-right arrow * 300 This new workflow is such a pain that's why I thought I was doing this prior. I wonder what I was actually doing then?. Hmm. Anyway, possible to add this to the feature list? There's gotta be some regex that would correctly assume the basic usage of a missing opening parenthesis, as I'm sure a pretty complex expression would be hard, but then again, something that complex one wouldn't be using Alfred for a quick answer. Thanks for the app. Powerpack Mega supporter

It used to do this, and for the last 6-12 months it hasn't (came looking for a solution as I'm tired of going back to the start of the field to put that opening '(' there.