That's really odd, cause I'm pretty certain that in the past I wouldn't have to have the open parenthesis
1.45-.78)*300
would show the answer of 201
(as now my workflow is: )
1.45-.78)* backspace alt-left-arrow ( alt-right arrow * 300
This new workflow is such a pain that's why I thought I was doing this prior. I wonder what I was actually doing then?. Hmm.
Anyway, possible to add this to the feature list? There's gotta be some regex that would correctly assume the basic usage of a missing opening parenthesis, as I'm sure a pretty complex expression would be hard, but then again, something that complex one wouldn't be using Alfred for a quick answer.
Thanks for the app.
Powerpack Mega supporter