Jump to content

schrodinger_cat

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    16

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

See reputation activity

About schrodinger_cat

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. schrodinger_cat
    Personally, I have nothing against dark border, however it should be consistent and smooth at the corners, otherwise it looks bad, as I've mentioned in this thread.
  2. schrodinger_cat
    Seems to be related:
  3. schrodinger_cat
    Here is the issue: Alfred 4.0.1 b1078 macOS 10.14.5 (18F132)
  4. schrodinger_cat
    Seems to be related:
  5. schrodinger_cat
    After updating to Alfred 4 I've noticed that corners of themes looks bad especially on light backgrounds: Here is one of default themes: It's actually quite noticeable and distracting. Alfred 4.0.1 b1078 macOS 10.14.5 (18F132) Download theme from first screenshot.
  6. schrodinger_cat
    I would also love for Alfred to inherit current macOS theme setting and switch between two predetermined by user themes automatically. This is arguably more important, since search field is the main interface of Alfred and used more frequently than settings. Of course, you can switch manually now, but most applications are inherit this setting from macOS since Mojave. Also, many people, including me, are using light theme during the day and switch to the dark one in the evening (and there are a couple of good applications to do that automatically, so changing Alfred theme manually is a bit of
  7. schrodinger_cat
    Hi! I want to purchase Alfred Remote, but the fact it isn't updated for almost 3 years worries me. There is no support for modern devices and iOS features. What's the state of the project, and should we expect new updates for it?
  8. schrodinger_cat
    Second this. Please, add to existing queries, though, to search both in item name and URL simultaneously, if possible.
  9. schrodinger_cat
    The thing is, it's kinda a big deal, the usefulness of this functionality is heavily dependant on the ability to specify search terms in any order. Typical use is: Type one query term. See results. Add another term to filter results further. Repeat until specific item is found. When adding another term (step 3), it's very rare when terms are in the exact order they're in bookmark name. The user shouldn't be expected to specify the exact string when searching. So yeah, if it's possible, I think it's worth investigating. Thank you!
  10. schrodinger_cat
    Why not to use multiple SQL queries then? Like this workflow is doing. Performance is perfectly fine for me with this one.
  11. schrodinger_cat
    Is this also the reason why I cannot type search terms in any order? I'd love for space to act as logical AND in query like in almost all search engines.
  12.    schrodinger_cat reacted to a post in a topic: Transmit 4 Favorites Workflow, FAST
  13. schrodinger_cat
    This workflow is awesome! I'll have some feedback after using it more. I have to agree to this. The name is exactly on point.
  14. schrodinger_cat
    There no need to assign every workflow to default results, though. It's for the user to decide, if he wants trade some performance for convenience of getting workflow output in default results. User absolutely can kill Alfred performance already: This is more strong argument against it, I think: Maybe, as it often happens, I confused habit with convenience. I'll try to use everything separately for now, with different keyword and not messing up default results. Thank you! This is no doubt would be useful, even when trying to use
  15. schrodinger_cat
    Well, it doesn't, mostly, except, correct me if I'm wrong, it's the only way to get items in default results without using keyword. Perhaps, somehow allowing to add output from workflow to default results would be a better and more unified solution? But as far as I understand, this is much harder to do. It's just struck me as strange, that you can search through Bookmarks natively but not History. Now, though, when you explained hoops you need to jump through in order to make this work, this makes much more sense. My goal is to replicate how search bars in mod
  16. schrodinger_cat
    Indeed, I'm aware of this workflow. I should've clarified, I'm suggesting to add this functionality as a native built-in feature similar to Bookmarks Search added in Alfred 3.5 in order to consolidate both Bookmarks and History search results in one query. P.S. Sorry, I haven't manage to find similar requests for some reason
×
×
  • Create New...