Jump to content

Dzier

Member
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dzier

  1. On 5/1/2018 at 4:49 PM, Martien Oranje said:

     

    Si you are saying you expect 1 to have the lowest priority?

     

    No, the workflow or service (in High Sierra) is assigning inverted values. As I said before, if I give Priority (!!) 1 to a task, the workflow assigns !!4 to it and thats what should be corrected ;)

     

    You can see it here: Screen Recorded

     

    Sorry for the delay of the response.

  2. 1 hour ago, Martien Oranje said:

     

    What is your search?

     

    I could produce an alfa build that had most of the new features implemented. But I haven't updated the test suite yet.

     

    Ps. The priorities being inverted is a could be due to the Todoist server and client reasoning different about priorities, what is your expected behaviour?

     

    Thanks for the quick response!

     I'm just only adding a task ;) (By the way, I'm seaching a Screen Protector for my FitBit). About the behavior, the normal as usual, if you declare !!1 then !!1, not !!4 to guess that is !!1 :blink:

     

    I'll wait anxious :ph34r:

  3. On 8/11/2017 at 4:51 PM, Martien Oranje said:

    Do create an issue, I'll see if I can get around to fixing the problem. Any error messages to help me along?

     

    Hi @Martien Oranje! Well I have an issue with the workflow since I upgrade to High Sierra 10.13.2, this is the debug message, I think is the same:

    [2018-01-05 10:18:03][input.scriptfilter] Queuing argument 'Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit #Personal !!1 , today'
    [2018-01-05 10:18:04][input.scriptfilter] Script with argument '(null)' finished
    [2018-01-05 10:18:04][input.scriptfilter] {"items":[{"title":"Create new task - Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit","uid":"todoist_create_task","arg":"{\"labels\":[],\"priority\":\"1\",\"project\":\"Personal\",\"date\":\"today\",\"task\":\"Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit\"}","type":"default","valid":true,"autocomplete":"Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit #Personal !!1 , today","icon":"icon.png","subtitle":"PERSONAL          ‼ 1          ⧖ today          "},{"title":"Set project","uid":"--------------------","arg":"","type":"default","valid":false,"autocomplete":"Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit #Personal !!1 , today #","icon":{"path":"project.png"},"subtitle":"Store task in a project, ex. #Work"},{"title":"Add label","uid":"--------------------","arg":"","type":"default","valid":false,"autocomplete":"Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit #Personal !!1 , today @","icon":{"path":"label.png"},"subtitle":"Add a label to this task, ex. @15min"},{"title":"Set priority","uid":"--------------------","arg":"","type":"default","valid":false,"autocomplete":"Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit #Personal !!1 , today !!","icon":{"path":"priority.png"},"subtitle":"Set task priority, ex. !!3"},{"title":"Set date","uid":"--------------------","arg":"","type":"default","valid":false,"autocomplete":"Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit #Personal !!1 , today , ","icon":{"path":"date.png"},"subtitle":"Set a date using a todoist date string, ex. today"}]}
    [2018-01-05 10:18:06][input.scriptfilter] Processing output of 'action.script' with arg '{"labels":[],"priority":"1","project":"Personal","date":"today","task":"Buscar lamina proctectora FitBit"}'
    [2018-01-05 10:18:17][action.script] Processing output of 'utility.junction' with arg 'Error: Invalid argument value ({"threshold":1,"expected":"minlen","argument":"temp_id"})
    '
    [2018-01-05 10:18:17][utility.junction] Processing output of 'utility.filter' with arg 'Error: Invalid argument value ({"threshold":1,"expected":"minlen","argument":"temp_id"})
    '
    [2018-01-05 10:18:17][utility.filter] Processing output of 'output.notification' with arg 'Error: Invalid argument value ({"threshold":1,"expected":"minlen","argument":"temp_id"})
    '
    [2018-01-05 10:18:17][utility.junction] Processing output of 'utility.filter' with arg 'Error: Invalid argument value ({"threshold":1,"expected":"minlen","argument":"temp_id"})

    There's is also a issue with priorities, they are displaying in the wrong way, like they are inverted, ex: !!4 (in the workflow is !!1), !!1 (in the workflow is !!4)

     

    Thanks in advance, and so many thanks for creating this amazing workflow, it simplified a lot the administration of assignment keys and learn them T.T!

×
×
  • Create New...