Luther

Worked like a charm @Stephen_C! Thank you so much!

Good morning all! How can I create a workflow that will autofill user name and password fields one after the other, only hitting enter after the password field is targeted and filled? For example, say I am logging into website 'ABC'. I have a field for user name and a field for password, one field is atop the other field. User name [input_username_here] Password: [input_password_here] How can I make a workflow to accomplish this? Attached a screenshot of the typical format for these fields, how they appear one after the other.

You are an absolute legend. THANK YOU!!!

Thank you SO much once again @vitor! Your help has been so appreciated. Thank you for your time on this. I've set this up just as you shared and applied it to four snippets where I reference the date. AWESOME! Do you know if there is any way to strip out the year from the date format? For example, instead of the snippet (thank you again!!!) spitting out 02/16/22, I could trim off the year and spit out 02/16? Do let me know your thoughts, and thank you so much, @vitor! Best, Erik

Good morning Alfred Fam, I am back again! Trying to understand if it is possible to create a dynamic snippet that can forecast today + 2d, but ignore weekends. For example, let's say today is Monday, Feb 7. In my update to my customer, I will let them know that if they do not respond in two business days I will close their case. So, it will say something like... Where "_DATE_" will be today (henceforth 'n') + 2 days: 2/9/22 The hiccup with the currently available Alfred {datetime +1d} is that weekends are included, so I always have to go back and edit this as we do not count weekend days as "strikeable" days (i.e. days we can count toward a "No Response" closure of a case). Does anyone know if it is possible to intelligently only include business days in a snippet, and if so, how? (i.e. skip weekends) So if I updated a case today, Friday, Feb 11, instead of the snippet saying that I'd close the case on n+2: 2/13/22 (a Sunday), it would instead say that I'd close it on n+2(-weekend): 2/15/22. Any thoughts on how to do this dynamically in a snippet? Thank you so much! Best, Erik

Truly, I cannot thank you enough. This is going to be so, immeasurably helpful in my day-to-day, Vitor. THANK YOU!

Thank you SO much, vitor!! I am so grateful for your help!!

I understand that I need to split the argument to variables, but I do not know how to build and launch the URL after that so that it is dynamic and doesn't expect a hard-coded query count (e.g. one, two, three, etc queries).

Good morning all, I am trying to search against some multiple queries in a ServiceNow table. Essentially, what I want the workflow to do is be able to add in a new field + operator + term with each query I enter, that way I don't have to hard-code a certain count of queries. To break it down, my initial search, with one query, would look like this as a URL: https://support.servicenow.com/sn_customerservice_case_list.do?sysparm_query=close_notesLIKEQuery1 Or, if I wanted to add two terms, it would append this to the URL: ^close_notesLIKEQuery2 The full URL would look like: https://support.servicenow.com/sn_customerservice_case_list.do?sysparm_query=close_notesLIKEQuery1^close_notesLIKEQuery2 Regarding entering the queries into the Alfred searchbar, I'd like to have some keyword, like 'eespc' (erik e, search past cases) and then add in the queried terms, separated by commas, where each added comma + term would append a new ^close_notesLIKEQuery2, ^close_notesLIKEQuery3, ^close_notesLIKEQuery4, etc. to the URL. So, I could press CMD + Spacebar and do 'eespc Query1, Query2, Query3', and each queried term would show up in it's own appended '^close_notesLIKEQuery' URL piece. Can someone please help me to do this? I'm very new to using Workflows in Alfred, but I know this would be SO helpful to have for daily productivity, etc. Thank you all so very much!!

Do you know of any "fix" to this issue Vero? Thank you, Erik

Yes - this is inside a VM. I notice I also hear two noises as if the VM is trying to operate off of a pre-license state and also a licensed response... does that make sense Vero?

Hi there, I'm facing an issue where if I try to expand text, it does expand, but it always places a 'v' in front of the expanded text. For example, if my expansion is: zzz = "Hey, how are you?" I'll type zzz and "vHey, how are you?" will be the result. Any idea why this is happening? Thanks, Erik