First off, Alfred workflows are blowing my mind... so thanks .
After creating a few test workflows and reading through a handful from this topic I have some things I've been thinking about.
1) Would it be possible, and what do you think, about having the ability to pass the output of one workflow into the input of another workflow.
In this way, you would be able to create little modules of reusable functionality to build up more complex chains of workflows.
2) Filtering the list of Feedback items? If I manually want to build up a list of feedback items to be used as the input to some other step in a chain, I think it'd be nice right now to filter out the list. It appears that typing into Alfred doesn't do that yet. Am I missing something?
3) Script Filter -> Run Script -> Run Script isn't possible. It seems like you can only have one level of each type [Trigger/Input/Action/Output]. Thoughts on allowing for a more robust chain if you wanted things to pass sequentially through multiple script steps... say after you've chosen a feedback item in one step that lead to the next step.. so on and so on. This could probably be alleviated by #1.
As a side question about Alfred, would fuzzy finding of results every be considered? The file action is awesome, but a little limiting in that it must match the start of a file/folder exactly.
Cheers!