Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 11/7/2022 at 11:55 PM, dfay said:

how are you handling such cases?


As per the pinned post, right now they’re collected but not added.

 

Some workflows won’t be accepted yet but might go in at a later stage; we’ll discuss each case-by-case. An example would be workflows with unsigned binaries—those were you get the “unidentified developer” macOS warning. 

Submit them anyway but let us know it’s unsigned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Great! Thank you for letting us know. Moving to in progress.

 

Something I’ve noticed is that you’re marking UUID and Lorem Ipsum as required and use a placeholder. Consider instead removing the placeholder and making it the default value. Marking a field as required should be done when you need some information for which you cannot have a default, such as an API key. But UUID and Loren Ipsum length are both preferences, so having a default makes the workflow considerably easier to set up on first run.

 

Edited by vitor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/2/2022 at 12:33 PM, cage.chung said:

A Swiss Army knife for developers for Alfred. 

 

My English is far from great, but the description in the workflow and README would be more accurate and better worded if you replaced "for developers for Alfred" with "for workflow developers".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, xilopaint

 

Thanks for your feedback.  Could you give more information about What is workflow definition? As a microservices developer.  encode/decode/jwt/string case ects. is daily workload essential tools. That's why i create this workflow.

 

"for workflow developers" sounds like to developer develop workflow? Do i miss understanding?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2022 at 3:56 AM, cage.chung said:

Hi, xilopaint

 

Thanks for your feedback.  Could you give more information about What is workflow definition? As a microservices developer.  encode/decode/jwt/string case ects. is daily workload essential tools. That's why i create this workflow.

 

"for workflow developers" sounds like to developer develop workflow? Do i miss understanding?

 

Oh, I'm sorry. Now I see I got confused about the purpose of your workflow. It's not intended to provide tools just for workflow developers, but for developers in general. Anyway, I still think your sentence is not well worded, perhaps it should be better phrased as "A Swiss Army knife for developers". The way you wrote ("for developers for Alfred") sounds odd in English, at least for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...