Multiple fall back searches not work.

[Alan He]

I created two fallback searches: one to open the browser and the other to open the GPT App.

I added both to the fallback search, and the actual test found that the second fallback search would not take effect. No matter which one you choose, it will open the GPT App.

 

 

 

 

## version info

 

Alfred v5.5.1

MacOS Sequoia 15.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited November 1 by Alan He

[FireFingers21]

@Alan He Make sure you configure the "Open With" option in the Open URL Action to your desired browser. Leaving it as Default Browser will default to the dedicated app if it's installed.

[Alan He]

6 minutes ago, FireFingers21 said:

@Alan He Make sure you configure the "Open With" option in the Open URL Action to your desired browser. Leaving it as Default Browser will default to the dedicated app if it's installed.

 

Amazing, it's solved, but I think it's Alfred's problem or the browser's problem.

 

This is a URL, not a URL Scheme. Entering the URL in the browser itself will not switch to the App.

 

 

 

 

Because of this problem, I have to use Script to solve it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited November 1 by Alan He

[FireFingers21]

4 minutes ago, Alan He said:

but I think it's Alfred's problem or the browser's problem.

 

It's neither, this is actually a feature of macOS. I made a post about it several months ago, apps have the ability to use both generic http and app specific URL schemes.

[Alan He]

1 hour ago, FireFingers21 said:

 

It's neither, this is actually a feature of macOS. I made a post about it several months ago, apps have the ability to use both generic http and app specific URL schemes.

 

thank you.

[Tung]

Hi,
I've been using your Audio Switcher, but it appears to be compatible only with macOS Monterey. I was wondering how you manage audio switching in Sequoia? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!

[Stephen_C]

Please see this post for the proper way in which to report a problem with a workflow. It would be helpful if you would provide the full information specified in the appropriate thread…where the author of the workflow is more likely to see it and to be able to help you.

 

Stephen