xilopaint Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 On 8/30/2018 at 6:57 PM, deanishe said: If you can build the workflow from the develop branch, it should work as expected. Beyond that, I'll try to release a new RC at the weekend. There are a few fixes/enhancements in develop and Niki has started posting duplicates of his own issues on the Searchio! repo. Unfortunately I can't do it without any Go knowledge. I tried to build the search.go file with go build search.go and didn't succeed because of some missing packages.I thought about installing the packages on my $GOPATH but I was afraid to screw up everything so I gave up. Hope the new RC will not take long. Link to comment
deanishe Posted September 3, 2018 Author Share Posted September 3, 2018 I've just had a look, and it's more or less uncompilable at the moment. The AwGo API has changed a lot since then, so it'll need a bit of a rewrite Perhaps I can make a release using the binary I'm currently using. That one seems to work… Link to comment
xilopaint Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, deanishe said: I've just had a look, and it's more or less uncompilable at the moment. The AwGo API has changed a lot since then, so it'll need a bit of a rewrite Perhaps I can make a release using the binary I'm currently using. That one seems to work… It's ok for me. If you prefer don't making a new release you can share the binary on this thread as well. Edited September 3, 2018 by xilopaint Link to comment
xilopaint Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 On 9/3/2018 at 7:11 PM, deanishe said: Perhaps I can make a release using the binary I'm currently using. That one seems to work… Please, don't forget me! ? Link to comment
deanishe Posted September 22, 2018 Author Share Posted September 22, 2018 Just now, xilopaint said: Please, don't forget me! ? I haven't! It's all gone a bit tits-up as I've massively revised the AwGo library, so no rebuild without a non-trivial rewrite. Link to comment
xilopaint Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 5 minutes ago, deanishe said: I haven't! It's all gone a bit tits-up as I've massively revised the AwGo library, so no rebuild without a non-trivial rewrite. Ok, so could you please update your Reddit workflow fixing the autocomplete issue? ? Link to comment
deanishe Posted September 22, 2018 Author Share Posted September 22, 2018 15 hours ago, xilopaint said: Ok, so could you please update your Reddit workflow fixing the autocomplete issue? ? https://github.com/deanishe/alfred-reddit/releases/tag/v1.7 Link to comment
xilopaint Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 10 hours ago, deanishe said: https://github.com/deanishe/alfred-reddit/releases/tag/v1.7 Not working for me. Are you sure you committed the changes? Link to comment
deanishe Posted September 23, 2018 Author Share Posted September 23, 2018 9 hours ago, xilopaint said: Not working for me. Are you sure you committed the changes? Yes. "Not working" isn't a very helpful description, and this isn't the right thread for it. Please re-install the workflow, and if something isn't working, post in the workflow's thread. Link to comment
xilopaint Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, deanishe said: Yes. "Not working" isn't a very helpful description, and this isn't the right thread for it. Please re-install the workflow, and if something isn't working, post in the workflow's thread. Not necessary anymore. I just realised that I had to use ⇧ + ⇥ because ⇥ was selected as an action hotkey on Alfred Preferences. Now everything is ok. Edited September 23, 2018 by xilopaint Link to comment
nikivi Posted September 29, 2018 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Anyone with me on starting a fundraiser for Dean to release a new build of Searchio? Link to comment
xilopaint Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 On 9/29/2018 at 1:29 PM, nikivi said: Anyone with me on starting a fundraiser for Dean to release a new build of Searchio? I would accept to contribute but I don't believe a few small donations would make any difference to @deanishe's decision of developing a new build. Link to comment
nikivi Posted October 2, 2018 Share Posted October 2, 2018 (edited) New build! ✨? Edited October 2, 2018 by nikivi xilopaint 1 Link to comment
deanishe Posted October 2, 2018 Author Share Posted October 2, 2018 (edited) On 10/1/2018 at 9:59 AM, xilopaint said: I don't believe a few small donations would make any difference to @deanishe's decision of developing a new build You're right. @nikivi avoided that issue by making an extremely generous donation. Whole crates of beer! That and some good suggestions and a PR for improving the workflow. If I'm honest, the main reason I haven't released a proper v2 is that I hate developing this workflow. Because it rewrites its own info.plist, I have to delete and re-create a bunch of my own searches for each release, but most of all Alfred (or more precisely the FSEvents API) doesn't notice changes to symlinked files, so I have to re-link the workflow constantly and/or restart Alfred to get the changes to appear. More importantly, I'm wondering if the whole thing needs rewriting again. @nikivi wants to be able to have alternate search engines for modifier keys, so for example, ↩ does the search with Google, but ⌘↩ does the search with Google's I'm Feeling Lucky. I'm not a huge fan of that, but what I would like to do is separate suggestion sources from search URLs somewhat. That way you could use Google or DDG to provide suggestions for sites that have a search URL, but not an autosuggestion one. That would make the OpenSearch import a lot more useful (so far, I've found that only MediaWiki sites also provide the auto-suggestion API). I could automatically fall back to Google suggestions if the site doesn't have its own API (rather than failing), but I'm not sure how effective that would be. In either case, that's already possible by adding your own custom engine definitions in the data directory, but that's a sucky UX. Edited October 2, 2018 by deanishe xilopaint and nikivi 1 1 Link to comment
nikivi Posted October 2, 2018 Share Posted October 2, 2018 9 minutes ago, deanishe said: I would like to do is separate suggestion sources from search URLs somewhat What I thought would be cool. Is integration between my Web Searches workflow and your idea above. Use Google/DDG to drive suggestions, press return and fuzzy search the site to make the suggestion query on. I'd use that. Link to comment
xilopaint Posted October 2, 2018 Share Posted October 2, 2018 (edited) A minor issue: DDG's brand is DuckDuckGo and not Duck Duck Go. Edited October 2, 2018 by xilopaint Link to comment
deanishe Posted October 2, 2018 Author Share Posted October 2, 2018 1 hour ago, nikivi said: my Web Searches workflow and your idea above I'll have to look into that. I don't know your workflow, and I have no idea how it works. I don't really understand how you can fuzzy search a site unless its search API is set up for that already (which very, very few are). 55 minutes ago, xilopaint said: A minor issue: DDG's brand is DuckDuckGo and not Duck Duck Go. Dammit! Thanks for pointing that out, I guess. How the hell did they come up with such a stupid name, anyway? Link to comment
nikivi Posted October 2, 2018 Share Posted October 2, 2018 7 minutes ago, deanishe said: I don't know your workflow, and I have no idea how it works. I don't really understand how you can fuzzy search a site It's simple. You query Google/DDG for autosuggestions, use it for merely getting the autocomplete on query and on return open my workflow but save the query from before. Then search through 400+ websites on which you can run that query on. Link to comment
Guy Stan Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Fantastic work Dean! For youtube configuration, it looks like youtube doesn't have a localisation for UK. I have looked in the whole list and there is no United Kingdom, Great Britain, England or anything of this form. Might be worth to add it? Link to comment
deanishe Posted October 4, 2018 Author Share Posted October 4, 2018 You're right, it doesn't. If you looked up the appropriate localisation value and posted that, it would make it a lot easier and faster to add. Link to comment
Guy Stan Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 (edited) Hi Dean, I have tried but couldn't find where the location values are. Do you know where these can be found? I have searched the youtube API and couldn't find them there. Edited October 5, 2018 by Guy Stan Link to comment
Guy Stan Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 The only thing I found is the list of Google GeoLocation codes: https://fusiontables.google.com/DataSource?docid=1PMUKjN14MzsHiDlk5QfpkcpFJCEyEQOU4f6AQFwi#rows:id=1 The gl code seems to be gb (Great Britain) From this I assume the call would look something like: https://www.youtube.com/results?gl=gb&search_query= Link to comment
Ligeard Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Thanks a lot! I love to use "searchio" ;) Just a question: I can't do a search with "qwant", why? However, I added "qwant" in the search engines. PS: I'm sorry for my language, but I'm French Link to comment
deanishe Posted October 6, 2018 Author Share Posted October 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, Ligeard said: However, I added "qwant" in the search engines What does that mean? How did you add qwant? Without any concrete information regarding what you did, all I can say is, "You probably did it wrong." Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now