bevesce Posted January 15, 2013 Posted January 15, 2013 I would like to make workflow for tagging files with openmeta. At the moment I came up with File Action that copies files paths to clipboard and then I run tagging script with keyword followed by tags. It would be much better if paths in buffer were passed to script in way similar to query - {files}(?). Then I could put files in buffer, type keyword and tags to run workflow. untidey, jiku and Tyler Eich 3
tomhunt Posted January 17, 2013 Posted January 17, 2013 I believe the 'Accepts Multiple Files' toggle in the File Action node enables this. Files are returned as a tab separated list. You need to use alt+[up] to add items to the file buffer. Then alt+ to action all items in the buffer.
bevesce Posted February 9, 2013 Author Posted February 9, 2013 I believe the 'Accepts Multiple Files' toggle in the File Action node enables this. Files are returned as a tab separated list. You need to use alt+[up] to add items to the file buffer. Then alt+ to action all items in the buffer. Yes, I know about that but that's not what I'm writing about. I would like to have access to paths in buffer not from file action but from workflow triggered by keyword. For example: I add file to buffer using alt+up, then I type "tag test" where "tag" is keyword and then in script triggered by "tag" keyword have access to query - "test" and to paths of files in buffer.
Tyler Eich Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 Yes, I know about that but that's not what I'm writing about. I would like to have access to paths in buffer not from file action but from workflow triggered by keyword. For example: I add file to buffer using alt+up, then I type "tag test" where "tag" is keyword and then in script triggered by "tag" keyword have access to query - "test" and to paths of files in buffer. I want to do the same thing. Right now, I use this sequence: the file action caches the file list, calls Alfred with default keyword using AppleScript. I don't like this because it feels delicate, and if the user changes their keyword (as I often do with workflows I download), I'm going to have some unhappy users who don't understand this dependency. {files} sounds like an awesome solution
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now